<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web Site Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mediaministry.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/web-site-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mediaministry.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/web-site-analysis/</link>
	<description>Using the mediums of art and technology for ministry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:58:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ernie Stevenson</title>
		<link>http://mediaministry.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/web-site-analysis/#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernie Stevenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 12:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaministry.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/web-site-analysis/#comment-395</guid>
		<description>Thanks Ryan!  This is exactly what I&#039;m looking for.  I had a designer on the hook at one time but I believe that he was frustrated by the whole committee thing and kind of just dropped out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ryan!  This is exactly what I&#8217;m looking for.  I had a designer on the hook at one time but I believe that he was frustrated by the whole committee thing and kind of just dropped out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://mediaministry.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/web-site-analysis/#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 15:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaministry.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/web-site-analysis/#comment-394</guid>
		<description>Hmmm....&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;First off, let me preface this by saying that I do love volunteers, and I love when volunteers get involved.  However, this website screams &quot;church volunteer-created website&quot; to me.  Actually..it literally does.  It says &quot;by Clover&#039;s website committee.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;There are some very good things about it, though.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;strong&gt;It&#039;s thorough!&lt;/strong&gt;  There is tons of information on here.  So anyone could find anything they want.  However, the information might be able to be organized in a simpler way.  To me, the site is catered much more for the church member than for the visitor.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The colors aren&#039;t &lt;strong&gt;too&lt;/strong&gt; bad.  I&#039;ve seen a lot worse.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Now, the things that need some help:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;strong&gt;It&#039;s made with tables.&lt;/strong&gt;  This is making the website look like it was built in the 90&#039;s, and I haven&#039;t done a validity check on it, but I doubt it&#039;s going to pass.  All CSS would make things so much more cleaner..but not many volunteers know how to use CSS well.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;strong&gt;There are many missing links and missing pictures.&lt;/strong&gt;  This is never good.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;strong&gt;It needs a designer.&lt;/strong&gt;  While the colors aren&#039;t as awful as many websites I&#039;ve seen, they could be better, and much of the alignment of tables is just plain not consistent.  Again..moving over to CSS-driven design would help this immensely.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I do think that the most important thing about a website, however, is content, and this one does have plenty of it.  However, I&#039;m not sure if the content is particularly useful since there isn&#039;t any interaction anywhere.  I believe church websites should be much more community-driven, as the church is a community.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;All in all, it&#039;s not nearly as bad as many websites I&#039;ve seen..but it just needs a transplant into today&#039;s design and communication.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;.</p>
<p>First off, let me preface this by saying that I do love volunteers, and I love when volunteers get involved.  However, this website screams &#8220;church volunteer-created website&#8221; to me.  Actually..it literally does.  It says &#8220;by Clover&#8217;s website committee.&#8221;</p>
<p>There are some very good things about it, though.</p>
<p><strong>It&#8217;s thorough!</strong>  There is tons of information on here.  So anyone could find anything they want.  However, the information might be able to be organized in a simpler way.  To me, the site is catered much more for the church member than for the visitor.</p>
<p>The colors aren&#8217;t <strong>too</strong> bad.  I&#8217;ve seen a lot worse.</p>
<p>Now, the things that need some help:</p>
<p><strong>It&#8217;s made with tables.</strong>  This is making the website look like it was built in the 90&#8217;s, and I haven&#8217;t done a validity check on it, but I doubt it&#8217;s going to pass.  All CSS would make things so much more cleaner..but not many volunteers know how to use CSS well.</p>
<p><strong>There are many missing links and missing pictures.</strong>  This is never good.</p>
<p><strong>It needs a designer.</strong>  While the colors aren&#8217;t as awful as many websites I&#8217;ve seen, they could be better, and much of the alignment of tables is just plain not consistent.  Again..moving over to CSS-driven design would help this immensely.</p>
<p>I do think that the most important thing about a website, however, is content, and this one does have plenty of it.  However, I&#8217;m not sure if the content is particularly useful since there isn&#8217;t any interaction anywhere.  I believe church websites should be much more community-driven, as the church is a community.</p>
<p>All in all, it&#8217;s not nearly as bad as many websites I&#8217;ve seen..but it just needs a transplant into today&#8217;s design and communication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
